Mutual Funds Review of Literature

A study was conducted by Artikis (2002) to analyze the risk adjusted performance of equity mutual funds operating in Greek from 1995-1998. For this purpose daily, weekly and monthly returns were calculated and compared with the GIASE. These funds were ranked on the basis of standard deviation, total risk, and techniques of Treynor (1965), Sharpe (1966), and Jensen. The results showed that coefficient of variations of seven mutual funds were higher than the GIASE whereas the total risk of all the seventeen mutual funds was lower than the GIASE. On the other hand Treynor (1965) index showed values higher than the General Index of the ASE.

Sorros (2003) examined the performance of equity mutual funds. For this purpose a sample of sixteen equity funds was taken for the period 1995-1999. The average daily returns of all the sample funds were calculated and these funds were ranked on the basis of the systematic risk, return, coefficient of variation, and techniques of Sharpe (1966) and Treynor (1965). Results showed that total risk and risk-return coefficient of all the sixteen mutual funds was lower than Athens Stock Exchange (ASE). It also showed that four mutual funds achieved lower return than ASE. The author also concluded that eight sample funds varied to some extent between the techniques proposed by Sharpe (1966) and Treynor (1965).

The study of Artikis (2003) evaluated the risk adjusted performance of the ten domestic mutual funds for the period 1/1/1995 – 31/12/1998. In doing so, the mutual funds under consideration were ranked on the basis of the return, and techniques of Treynor (1965), Sharpe (1966), and Jensen. The ten domestic balanced mutual funds participating in the research had lower return as compared to the return of General Index. However, this return appears to be satisfactory since the risk undertaken by these mutual funds was significantly lower than the corresponding risk of the General Index of the ASE. The ranking of the sample mutual funds varied to some extent among the techniques proposed by Treynor (1965), Sharpe (1966) and Jensen.

Bauer, Roger and Alireza (2006) conducted a research to analyze the performance of New Zealand mutual funds for the period January 1990 till September 2003. Study employed a sample of 143 open-ended mutual funds, of which 30 were domestic equity, 63 international equity and 50 multisectors, respectively. Study used different measures such as Single-factor performance model, Market timing model, Multifactor performance models, and Conditional multifactor performance model to evaluate the performance of the sample funds under period of analysis. The results indicated that New Zealand mutual funds had not been able to provide out-performance and that the balanced funds underperformed significantly. Researchers found no evidence of timing abilities by the fund managers but observed the return persistence for all funds in short term. Researcher also found that the risk-adjusted performance for equity funds is positively related to fund size and expense ratio and negatively related to load charges.

Fernández, Vicente and Andrada (2008) conducted a research to compare the average return on Spanish mutual funds with inflation, stock market investment and Spanish government bonds. The analysis was done during the period 1991-2007 and Index of the Madrid Stock Exchange (ITBM) was taken as benchmark. Study employed a sample of 935 mutual funds and made the analysis on 3, 5, 10 and 16 years basis. Various tables and charts were used for the purpose of comparison. The results concluded that during the past 10 and 16 years, the average return on mutual funds in Spain was lower than the average return on government bonds. Similarly the average return on mutual funds was also lower than the inflation. On the other hand out of 935 only 30 mutual funds outperformed the benchmark and only two of them outperformed the overall Index of the Madrid Stock Exchange (ITBM).